ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange

Attention: Answers.ros.org is deprecated as of August the 11th, 2023. Please visit robotics.stackexchange.com to ask a new question. This site will remain online in read-only mode during the transition and into the foreseeable future. Selected questions and answers have been migrated, and redirects have been put in place to direct users to the corresponding questions on Robotics Stack Exchange. Additional details are available here.

Revision history [back]

Gazebo simulation often is not 100% deterministic as minor timing variations of the real-time dynamics simulation leads to small (sometimes also large :) ) jitter. We get pretty consistent results when simulating/evaluating path-planning/SLAM and other high level software however. Sounds like your potential field implementation might not be robust against such jitter with the parameters you used. Have you tried it with another simulator or real robot?

ROS Answers is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.

Powered by Askbot version 0.10.2