ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

Hi....this load of machines are stunning. The objective for ROS appears to increment dramatically. I was conversing with a VB6 designer about packaging ROS with his VB6 programs similarly as you would package a runtime. In the event that any semblance of MS at any point reassess VB6 on MS stages then he may convey his projects with an o/s whereupon to run it. The constraint there is that the o/s would have to run on a virtual climate. With these equipment gadgets he could package his program with the VB6 runtime on a packaged ReactOS and thus toss in some packaged equipment whereupon it runs.

Hi....this load of machines are stunning. The objective for ROS appears to increment dramatically. I was conversing with a VB6 designer about packaging ROS with his VB6 programs similarly as you would package a runtime. In the event that any semblance of MS at any point reassess VB6 on MS stages then he may convey his projects with an o/s whereupon to run it. The constraint there is that the o/s would have to run on a virtual climate. With these equipment gadgets he could package his program with the VB6 runtime on a packaged ReactOS and thus toss in some packaged equipment whereupon it runs.runs. https://www.7pcb.com/