Revision history [back]

I m using both of them.

For my experience AutowareAuto offers more tutorials and courses. But the flexibility to write codes, reuse packages, switch sensor, planners, etc are not possible without hard implementation from your team side. Besides that AutowareAuto is 90% C++ based. While in AutowareAI you have possibility to work more with Python, you have also more flexibility and an outstanding user-interface (The runtime-manager) that AutowareAuto does not provide. Therefore your team can control the modules easier and have more flexibility to switch the algorithms of each one of these modules (perception, localization, routing, etc).

I would say AutowareAI is best for survey purposes. AutowareAuto howeever is more suitable for application and test on the real autonomous vehicle, once it assures more safety on connections.

I m using both of them.

For From my experience AutowareAuto offers more tutorials and courses. But the flexibility to write codes, reuse packages, switch sensor, planners, etc are not possible without hard implementation from your team side. Besides that AutowareAuto is 90% C++ based. While in AutowareAI you have possibility to work more with Python, you have also more flexibility and an outstanding user-interface (The runtime-manager) that AutowareAuto does not provide. Therefore your team can control the modules easier and have more flexibility to switch the algorithms of each one of these modules (perception, localization, routing, etc).

I would say AutowareAI is best for survey purposes. AutowareAuto howeever is more suitable for application and test on the real autonomous vehicle, once it assures more safety on connections.