ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

answered 2012-06-28 09:22:35 -0500

joq gravatar image

ROS is definitely not designed to work that way. Specifically, the current implementation requires long timeouts before discovering that a node has left the graph.

I doubt your approach is really a good idea. What problems are you trying to solve that way?

ROS is definitely not designed to work that way. Specifically, the current implementation requires long timeouts before discovering that a node has left the graph.

The usual ROS approach is for all nodes to run continuously. They may become active or inactive due to messages they receive.

I doubt your approach is really a good idea. What problems are you trying to solve that way?