The site is read-only. Please transition to use Robotics Stack Exchange
| ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
 | 1 | initial version |
Hello,
I am the maintainer of modular_cloud_matcher, and while I'm aware of ROS' repulsion of the use of C++0x, I decided to use it nevertheless because it made the code much cleaner and worked for the main ROS platforms starting from GCC 4.4 (Ubuntu Lucid). I did not use any features not explicitly supported and tested with GCC 4.4. Moreover, I think that it is good people begin testing ROS with C++0x as it will help with the eventual transition.
I did not expect too much problems such as this one to happen, as C++0x is supposed to be highly backward compatible, but it does happen sometimes.
Do you have a link to the trac ticket?
In the mean time, I am working on a way to fix this problem
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
Hello,
I am the maintainer of modular_cloud_matcher, and while I'm aware of ROS' repulsion of the use of C++0x, I decided to use it nevertheless because it made the code much cleaner and worked for the main ROS platforms starting from GCC 4.4 (Ubuntu Lucid). I did not use any features not explicitly supported and tested with GCC 4.4. Moreover, I think that it is good people begin testing ROS with C++0x as it will help with the eventual transition.
I did not expect too much problems such as this one to happen, as C++0x is supposed to be highly backward compatible, but it does happen sometimes.
Do you have a link to the trac ticket?ticket? I did not find it.
In the mean time, I am working on a way to fix this problem
| | 3 | No.3 Revision |
Hello,
I am the maintainer of modular_cloud_matcher, and while I'm aware of ROS' repulsion of the use of C++0x, I decided to use it nevertheless because it made the code much cleaner and worked for the main ROS platforms starting from GCC 4.4 (Ubuntu Lucid). I did not use any features not explicitly supported and tested with GCC 4.4. Moreover, I think that it is good people begin testing ROS with C++0x as it will help with the eventual transition.
I did not expect too much problems such as this one to happen, as C++0x is supposed to be highly backward compatible, but it does happen sometimes.
Do you I have a link to created patches that fix these issues, see the trac ticket? I did not find it.related ticket
In the mean time, I am working on a way to fix this problem
ROS Answers is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
