ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

This is not a standard for package layout, but for naming.

If there is a standard, it would be REP-144 - ROS Package Naming. Under section Naming Rules, it says:

Special Suffixes:

  • a package containing the URDF and meshes of a robot should be named <name_of_the_robot>_description, e.g pr2_description

So this basically says: packages with robot models should be called X_description.

That is most likely what the tutorial you linked refers to.

This is not a standard for package layout, but for naming.

If there is a standard, it would be REP-144 - ROS Package Naming. Under section Naming Rules[Naming Rules](REP-144 - ROS Package Naming, it says:

Special Suffixes:

  • a package containing the URDF and meshes of a robot should be named <name_of_the_robot>_description, e.g pr2_description

So this basically says: packages with robot models should be called X_description.

That is most likely what the tutorial you linked refers to.

This is not a standard for package layout, but for naming.

If there is a standard, it would be REP-144 - ROS Package Naming. Under section [Naming Rules](REP-144 - ROS Package Naming, it says:

Special Suffixes:

  • a package containing the URDF and meshes of a robot should be named <name_of_the_robot>_description, e.g pr2_description

So this basically says: packages with robot models should be called X_description.

That is most likely what the tutorial you linked refers to.


Edit:

Thanks. I'm lost with this. It's hard to start learning ROS.

Note btw: I just referred to the REP as it's a convenient document. The custom / convention of naming pkgs with robot models in them description packages has existed since long before REP-144 was written.