The site is read-only. Please transition to use Robotics Stack Exchange
| ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
 | 1 | initial version |
If you look at roscpp, the current handler on SIGINT just call ros::requestShutdown() so you should fine as it is.
See: https://code.ros.org/svn/ros/stacks/ros_comm/tags/electric/clients/cpp/roscpp/src/libros/init.cpp
On a different point, requesting a shutdown on ROS just switch a boolean variable (see the previous source code) so IMHO it should be safe to continue using ROS after resquestShutdown is called... Maybe someone can confirm?
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
If you look at roscpp, the current handler on SIGINT just call ros::requestShutdown() so you should fine as it is.be with your current solution.
See: https://code.ros.org/svn/ros/stacks/ros_comm/tags/electric/clients/cpp/roscpp/src/libros/init.cpp
On a different point, requesting a shutdown on ROS just switch a boolean variable (see the previous source code) so IMHO it should be safe to continue using ROS after resquestShutdown is called... Maybe someone can confirm?
ROS Answers is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
