ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

I was over thinking it. As long as the IMU was mounted on the robot rigidly, the roll and pitch doesn't need additional transforms/conversions done to the values themselves.

I ended up not using the hector_imu_attitude_to_tf node. My constraint was having an IMU be mounted with a rotation of -3.14 radians(in the x direction). I subscribed to the imu topic(add the offset), then included the roll/pitch to the base_link transform and odometry.

I don't think the hector_imu_attitude_to_tf_node allows for an imu which is mounted in a different orientation as the base_link.