ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange |
1 | initial version |
Thanks, great, output="screen"
works perfectly, I can see my gdb back!
Thanks for the tiny manual, I keep it in my bookmarks.
why the hell there are no automatic tests written, huh?
Well, I'm just prototyping a node, I do not even know if we will keep this part of the project, I reserve tests for the future ^^
While I've set ROS_BUILD_TYPE to Debug in CMakeList, but gdb says (no debugging symbols found)
. What am I missing there?
My bug seems to be an insertion of an uninitialized object in a std::vector<> but it would be more handy with debbugging symbols :D
2 | No.2 Revision |
Thanks, great, output="screen"
works perfectly, I can see my gdb back!
Thanks for the tiny manual, I keep it in my bookmarks.
why the hell there are no automatic tests written, huh?
Well, I'm just prototyping a node, I do not even know if we will keep this part of the project, I reserve tests for the future ^^
While I've set ROS_BUILD_TYPE to Debug in CMakeList, but gdb says (no debugging symbols found)
. What am I missing there?there?
I self-reply: My CMakeCache was overidding CMakeList. Setting CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Debug
is ok!
My bug seems to be an insertion of an uninitialized object in a std::vector<> but it would be more handy with debbugging symbols :D
Many thanks to you all and to gdb!
3 | No.3 Revision |
Thanks, great, output="screen"
works perfectly, I can see my gdb back!
Thanks for the tiny manual, I keep it in my bookmarks.
why the hell there are no automatic tests written, huh?
Well, I'm just prototyping a node, I do not even know if we will keep this part of the project, I reserve tests for the future ^^
While I've set ROS_BUILD_TYPE to Debug in CMakeList, but gdb says (no debugging symbols found)
. What am I missing there?
I self-reply: My CMakeCache was overidding CMakeList. Setting CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Debug
is ok!
My bug seems to be an insertion of an uninitialized object in a std::vector<> but it would be more handy with debbugging symbols :Dstd::vector<>
Many thanks to you all and to gdb!