ROS Resources: Documentation | Support | Discussion Forum | Index | Service Status | ros @ Robotics Stack Exchange
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

The camera_pose_calibration does essentially exactly what you´re looking for. Haven´t used it myself, so not sure how mature and easy to adaptable it is. The calibration package also is able to estimate transforms, but is originally meant for robot kinematic calibration. Based on it, a approach using the Google Ceres solver is also available. There are of course also other options, like registration using some PCL tools (if you have significant point cloud overlap), using AR markers visible in multiple views etc.

The camera_pose_calibration does essentially provides exactly what you´re looking for. Haven´t used it myself, so not sure how mature and easy to adaptable adapt it is. The calibration package also is able to estimate transforms, but is originally meant for robot kinematic calibration. Based on it, a approach using the Google Ceres solver is also available. There are of course also other options, like registration using some PCL tools (if you have significant point cloud overlap), using AR markers visible in multiple views etc.and others, which likely require some more work on your part.

The camera_pose_calibration package essentially provides exactly what you´re looking for. Haven´t used it myself, so not sure how mature and easy to adapt it is. The calibration package also is able to estimate transforms, but is originally meant for robot kinematic calibration. Based on it, a approach using the Google Ceres solver is also available. There are of course also other options, like registration using some PCL tools (if you have significant point cloud overlap), using AR markers visible in multiple views and others, which likely require some more work on your part.