Differences between RMW implementations and their use of typesupport libraries
Hi,
I was playing with a ROS 2 application running it either with FastDDS or with CycloneDDS. Something that I noticed is that:
- CycloneDDS requires typesupport_introspection libraries in order to work
- FastDDS requires typesupport_fastrtps libraries in order to work
What are the differences, both from an end-user perspective as well as for what concerns the design of an RMW layer?
Asked by alsora on 2021-07-22 09:13:42 UTC
Comments